Random: What if...?

[Ogreasy]

Weird pic... Well drawn though..

Ja, I don't care for the skeleton thin girls either.
Hell, even sort of bigger girls are cool with me too. Intelligence is KEY with me. They've also got to be a freethinker and not let anyone else tell them what to do. Her personality should be really serious and efficient at times and silly and goofy at other times. I don't care for the whiny weak type. Like I said, beret wearing type girls are cool. I guess the goth girls are cool, the music is bad though. yuck.. Hmm, don't care for the uber hyper cheerleader type girl. The artsy/singer songwriter/musician/artist girl is cool with me. The computer nerd girl is ideal for me I think too. I'm not into cybersex though.. I guess I'll post more on this later.

[Ogreasy]

I guess it would... I couldn't see myself dating a nazi girl... Even without the killing of innocent people and all, just the ideaa of fascism.. What would nazi girls be like to date? Any ideas guys?

[Cavalier]

i love shy girls like tessa from FMP and funny girls like Lime from SMJ .......... i like alotta girls..... basically ..... muwahahahaha

[mrwiseman]

Nazis are fascists but not all fascists are nazis BTW...

I wouldn't have a problem dating or marrying a fascist girl as long as she's not racist; fascism is a political movement I respect if done without racism, genocide, or other bad things, and it respects private property and family values.

????

New what-if: What if, instead of Coca-Cola machines, we had STFU machines all around to give away nice, warm cups of STFU to everybody in need of them?

[Xellos]

Cav doesn't like real girls though [img]tongue.gif[/img]

IRT Miguel: That'd be so awesome! *Stupid girl in class is talking too much and getting everyone else in trouble* Hey, Erin, how about a nice cup of shut the fuck up? XD

[Ogreasy]

But fascists aren't for free expression or anything, they just want whats good for the whole?
I don't know much about fascism. Hmmm.. would fascism allow dating and all? OR would they force you into family units and stuff..??

[mrwiseman]

But fascists aren't for free expression or anything, they just want whats good for the whole?

Well, free expression is not necessarily the main or best goal in life. There are fascists of all kinds; the only thing they all have in common is the liking of authoritarian, centralized control (usually in the form of a dictatorship). Some of them are racist, and those following the nazi German party are the nazis, a particular case of fascists. Others can be pretty good persons which, as you said, seek good for the whole and think such government could be a way to achieve it.

Fascism would of course allow dating; I don't think even communists would regulate that. Most of them share traditional values and want our current modern life, only more regulated. Most models proposed by fascists are a dictatorship with a regular right-wing society (i.e. nothing insane) and a protected, restrictive economy (thus not capitalist). They don't decide where you should live, what should you wear, or where you study and work, like communists do. They do control expression to a varying degree and usually disallow opposition.

I personally share some of these ideas, but not all. My ideal would be a Constitutional Monarchy with the Royal Family and a democratic government (with a few particularities to avoid its current problems) sharing power 50/50, a right-wing society, a free economy (capitalism), efficient centralism, and an agnostic state which doesn't want to force religion on non-religious people or waste money on it.

[mrwiseman]

>_>;

[Nevan]

Well, I can see where you are coming from, Wiseman, but I have to say I like communism a lot more. Since communism hasn't really been done right yet, it makes it look bad. Such places as the former USSR, North Korea, China, etc. make communism into something that it is not. The true meaning of Marxism Communism (The true communism) is a classless society with no exploitation. No state machine used by one section of the population to oppress another section. No need for professional armies or police forces. No use of production for profit or exchange. Society runs in accord with the principle: From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.

So basically it is the shrinking of the state. But it should not be confused with anarchy, anarchy is for 12 year olds on AOL.

Like I said, most people just see it as another word for dictatorship, when really it is quite different from that.

[mrwiseman]

Communism has been attempted so many times, and it was always a failure. The only country that is somewhat developing while being communist is China, and that's because the only communist thing China has is the name, they dumped it years ago, but didn't want to admit. Also, I wouldn't call it an utopy, an utopy is supposed to be an unreachable heaven, and it doesn't look like it at all to me; not having private property, being equal to everybody, having no rights to be an independent individual, and being an ant. What the State should guarantee is equal opportunities, not equal beings, otherwise the imbeciles, slackers, and corrupts, will get the same resources as the smartest, hard-working, honest ones. Besides, it's impossible to have a state without security forces; other countries have armies and would gladly take over it if it was important but didn't have some military power, and police forces are necessary because some people will always try to do nasty things. I also hate the idea of the State owning everything I work (hard) for, the only thing I find acceptable is that the King and Queen own the land and lease it to citizens, but the citizens' things are the citizens' things, not somebody else's. And why does the State have to determine MY needs? I'm an individual, not an ant, I have different needs than other people ?for example, I don't need a car right now, but I need 2 computers for my experiments (which under communism I wouldn't be allowed to carry on)?, I know better than a bunch of bureaucrats what I need, and how I like it, and I should get it or not according to my work and the value of it for the society, and the best way to quantize and regulate this is currency.

I did differentiate between communism and fascism, though some regimes are both. Personally, if I had to choose, I'd go for fascism without thinking much ? at least I would still be a individual under the second, not a State resource "worker".